While the analysis of an author’s
writing style is often done in the first couple of chapters, I am glad that
saved this task for the end book because as the story of The Kite Runner came to a close some devices became apparent that before were unclear. I am also able to comment on the evolution of
my opinion of the books writing style and plausibility from start to
finish.
As I mentioned in a previous blog
post, the events that happen in the end of the novel create a sort of symmetry
as they reflect the beginning of the story.
The novel ends with Amir returning to his homeland where he visits sites
containing significant childhood memories.
This literary technique shows how time warped the beautiful land of
Amir’s childhood into a decrepit, war-torn country and Amir seeing his home in
this harsh candid light gives him a sense of closure for his long-ended
childhood. The author also uses
symbolism throughout the book. There
are, of course, kites, which are used to convey freedom and happiness and often
seem to embody the spirit of Hassan. The
last scene of the book is dedicated to kite flying. This section is the turning point where
Sohrab seems to finally begin to heal.
Watching Amir in the kite fight finally reengages him. He is described as “His gaze flitted between
our kite and the green one. His face was
a little flushed, his eyes suddenly alert.
Awake. Alive.” (pg. 396). This was the first time since Sohrab's hospitalization that he began acting like a child again. Another important symbol that I have mentioned before in my blog is the
pomegranate tree marked “’Amir and
Hassan, the sultans of Kabul.’”(pg. 27).
During their childhood the tree bared delicious fruit that the boys
enjoyed, but as Amir and Hassan are separated and their childhoods end, the tree
withers and eventually no longer produces fruit. This tree symbolizes the happy times the two
had in Kabul together and also the death of their childhoods.
This book begins as a recollection of
the narrator’s childhood, which he then goes on to tell the story of his
life. There are some gaps in time that
are left out of the novel and occasionally another character will tell a story
from their perspective, but as a whole the story is recalled by Amir in
chronological order. The first half of
the book can be described as relatively realistic. Amir’s reminiscence of his
childhood appears to be without significant embellishment and seems to be an accurate
depiction of the life of a wealthy Afghan boy in the 70s.
It becomes clear that the novel is fictitious in the second half of the
book. It was just is too perfect that
Assef was the Talib who took Sohrab and that Amir was finally able to face him
and confront his guilt. Other points
where the novel lacked realism were due to the author making a literary device
a bit too obvious. For example when Amir
remarks that the scar on his mouth was, “Like a harelip.”(pg. 297), insinuating
a connection between him and Hassan, this could have been more subtle. Even though this novel would be hard to pass
off as a true story, the development of the characters and the story it tells
makes The Kite Runner a meaningful well-told story that I would recommend anyone to read.